|
ז"לממ תצפהלו חותיפל ולעפ רשא םייטנסרטניאה םימרוגהתוריהמ ת"וחוד םושירב תיתועמשמ הדירי הלח םינומשה תונש ףוסב |
|
Caption: STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EMAD A. ABESKARON, et al. Docket No.: a0107-98 Decided: 24-Nov-1999 Summary: PER CURIAM The procedural posture of this appeal is somewhat unusual because it is based on the grant of leave to appeal by another panel of this court in part from adjudications in the Municipal Court of Parsippany. Defendants appeal both from a prior proceeding entitled In the Matter of the Admissibility of Motor Vehicle Speed Readings Produced by the LTI Marksman 20-20 Laser Speed Detection Sys., 314 N.J. Super. 233 (Law Div. 1998) (Laser II) and from the entry of conditional guilty pleas to speeding (N.J.S.A. 39:4-98) which preserved their right to appeal from the Laser II decision. Laser II was essentially a continuation of proceedings arising from earlier speeding cases. It approved the use of the LTI Marksman 20-20 Laser Speed Detection System (LTI Marksman) in the affected counties to aid the enforcement of motor vehicle speeding laws. The order granting leave to appeal granted the request to consolidate the four appeals from the speeding convictions and to appeal the judgment approving the use of the laser detector. |